Warrior Run, PA
Warrior Run wildfire risk explained
Warrior Run sits at the 56th percentile nationally for wildfire risk to structures — modestly above the national average for wildfire risk — per USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities model, built from its 310 counted buildings, not vegetation cover alone. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)
USFS's separate burn-probability score — fire likelihood alone, before counting what's built there — puts Warrior Run at the 55th percentile, close to its 56th-percentile risk score.
Warrior Run's building exposure, zone by zone
USFS puts 66.8% of Warrior Run's 310 buildings in the Indirect exposure zone, versus 33.2% Direct and 0% Minimal — a place where the fire doesn't need to reach the structure directly for embers to.
Where Warrior Run ranks
Warrior Run's 93rd-percentile standing inside Pennsylvania outpaces its 56th national percentile — this is a hotter spot than most of its own state, even though the state as a whole runs cooler nationally. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Warrior Run ranks 13,781 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 21,376 by building count (1 is largest). Within Pennsylvania alone, it ranks 154 of 1,991 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Pennsylvania on its state page.
Shopping for coverage in Warrior Run
Warrior Run's elevated wildfire rating (56th percentile) isn't the kind of score driving the carrier pullback making news in the highest-risk Western markets — but a standard homeowners quote is still worth comparing on its own terms.
Lowering exposure, not just insuring around it
Because 66.8% of Warrior Run's buildings sit in the Indirect zone, sealing the ember pathway (vents, roofing, gutters) is the intervention this page's data actually supports — see the home-hardening guide.
Where Warrior Run's figures come from
Warrior Run's 56th-percentile score and its burn-probability figure both come from the same USFS workbook, documented in the methodology guide. The exposure-zones guide covers what Warrior Run's dominant indirect exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.