WildfireRiskFinder

Warrenton, GA

Warrenton, GA's wildfire risk, in USFS's own numbers

High
74thpercentile nationally

USFS scores Warrenton at the 74th national percentile for wildfire risk to structures (well above the national norm for wildfire risk), a figure built from 966 real buildings rather than raw vegetation cover. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)

Separately from the risk score above, Warrenton's burn probability — fire likelihood with no building count factored in — sits at the 77th percentile nationally.

What "at risk" means for the buildings here

966Total buildings
57.4%Direct exposure
42.7%Indirect exposure
0%Minimal exposure

Of Warrenton's 966 counted buildings, 57.4% carry Direct exposure and only 0% carry Minimal — a lopsided split that puts defensible-space clearing ahead of vents or roofing as the intervention worth doing first.

How Warrenton compares

There's little gap between Warrenton's 74th national percentile and its 80th percentile inside Georgia, which means the state comparison mostly confirms what the national score already shows. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Warrenton ranks 8,093 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 12,180 by building count (1 is largest). Within Georgia alone, it ranks 134 of 669 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Georgia on its state page.

Shopping for coverage in Warrenton

Warrenton's high rating (74th percentile) puts it among the places where the national carrier-pullback trend is most relevant — not a guarantee of a coverage problem, but a reason to shop rather than assume.

Lowering exposure, not just insuring around it

Warrenton's 57.4% Direct-exposure share means lot clearing around the structure typically outweighs any single material upgrade here. The home-hardening guide ranks the options for a place shaped like this.

More on how this number was built

Every one of the two percentiles behind Warrenton's 8,093-place national rank traces to USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities dataset — see the methodology guide. For more on what direct exposure implies beyond Warrenton, see the exposure-zones guide.