Warner Robins, GA
Warner Robins, GA's wildfire risk, in USFS's own numbers
Warner Robins sits at the 56th percentile nationally for wildfire risk to structures — modestly above the national average for wildfire risk — per USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities model, built from its 28,178 counted buildings, not vegetation cover alone. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)
Fire likelihood alone (USFS's burn-probability figure) ranks Warner Robins at the 57th national percentile — 1 points above its risk-to-structures score, a gap driven by how much is actually built there.
Warner Robins's building exposure, zone by zone
Most of Warner Robins's buildings (60.3% of 28,178) fall outside USFS's Direct and Indirect zones entirely — that doesn't zero out the score above, it means the risk is regional, not structure-by-structure. At 28,178 buildings, this is a substantial built environment, so the shares below describe a real population of structures, not a handful of edge cases.
How Warner Robins compares
Warner Robins's 56th national percentile looks worse in isolation than its 13th ranking inside Georgia does — this place is on the milder end for its own state, by 43 points. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Warner Robins ranks 13,896 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 430 by building count (1 is largest). Within Georgia alone, it ranks 585 of 669 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Georgia on its state page.
Shopping for coverage in Warner Robins
Warner Robins's elevated rating (56th percentile nationally) sits outside the range where wildfire risk alone reshapes an insurance market — still, a homeowner here loses nothing by comparing rates.
What would actually reduce this score
Warner Robins's 60.3% Minimal-exposure share means structure-level hardening matters less here than it would elsewhere — still worth the low-cost basics, per the home-hardening guide.
Where Warner Robins's figures come from
Warner Robins's 56th-percentile score and its burn-probability figure both come from the same USFS workbook, documented in the methodology guide. The exposure-zones guide covers what Warner Robins's dominant minimal exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.