Two Rivers, AK
Two Rivers, AK's wildfire risk, in USFS's own numbers
Two Rivers's 332 buildings earn a 100th-percentile wildfire-risk score nationally under USFS's model — in USFS's highest wildfire-risk band nationally. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)
Fire likelihood alone (USFS's burn-probability figure) ranks Two Rivers at the 100th national percentile — 0 points above its risk-to-structures score, a gap driven by how much is actually built there.
What "at risk" means for the buildings here
USFS classifies 100% of Two Rivers's buildings as Direct exposure, higher than its 0% Indirect share and far above its 0% Minimal share — a profile where 332 structures sit close enough to vegetation that lot clearing matters most.
How Two Rivers compares
There's little gap between Two Rivers's 100th national percentile and its 100th percentile inside Alaska, which means the state comparison mostly confirms what the national score already shows. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Two Rivers ranks 144 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 20,747 by building count (1 is largest). Within Alaska alone, it ranks 2 of 322 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Alaska on its state page.
Two Rivers and the insurance market
Two Rivers's very high rating (100th percentile) puts it among the places where the national carrier-pullback trend is most relevant — not a guarantee of a coverage problem, but a reason to shop rather than assume.
What would actually reduce this score
Two Rivers's 100% Direct-exposure share means lot clearing around the structure typically outweighs any single material upgrade here. The home-hardening guide ranks the options for a place shaped like this.
Where Two Rivers's figures come from
The methodology guide shows exactly how USFS turned 332 counted buildings into the percentiles shown above for Two Rivers. The exposure-zones guide covers what Two Rivers's dominant direct exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.