Stanfield, OR
Stanfield wildfire risk explained
USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities model puts Stanfield at the 65th national percentile for risk to structures, well above the national norm for wildfire risk — a score built from 995 actual buildings. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)
USFS's separate burn-probability score — fire likelihood alone, before counting what's built there — puts Stanfield at the 65th percentile, close to its 65th-percentile risk score.
Where Stanfield's buildings actually sit
USFS classifies 70.3% of Stanfield's buildings as Minimal exposure, the largest of the three zones here by a wide margin over 29.8% Direct and 0% Indirect — a landscape-level risk rather than a building-by-building one.
How Stanfield compares
Stanfield scores 65th nationally and 52nd within Oregon — close enough that its state context doesn't change the picture the national number already gives. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Stanfield ranks 11,033 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 11,972 by building count (1 is largest). Within Oregon alone, it ranks 201 of 420 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Oregon on its state page.
Shopping for coverage in Stanfield
Stanfield's 65th-percentile score lands in Oregon, the only two states requiring a wildfire disclosure at sale. Oregon's own hazard map feeds directly into that disclosure requirement. The disclosure-law guide covers what it requires.
What would actually reduce this score
Stanfield's 70.3% Minimal-exposure share means structure-level hardening matters less here than it would elsewhere — still worth the low-cost basics, per the home-hardening guide.
Where Stanfield's figures come from
Every one of the two percentiles behind Stanfield's 11,033-place national rank traces to USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities dataset — see the methodology guide. The exposure-zones guide covers what Stanfield's dominant minimal exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.