Rollingwood, TX
Rollingwood, TX's wildfire risk, in USFS's own numbers
Rollingwood sits at the 55th percentile nationally for wildfire risk to structures — modestly above the national average for wildfire risk — per USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities model, built from its 658 counted buildings, not vegetation cover alone. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)
USFS's separate burn-probability score — fire likelihood alone, before counting what's built there — puts Rollingwood at the 54th percentile, close to its 55th-percentile risk score.
Rollingwood's building exposure, zone by zone
Most of Rollingwood's buildings (68.1% of 658) fall outside USFS's Direct and Indirect zones entirely — that doesn't zero out the score above, it means the risk is regional, not structure-by-structure.
Where Rollingwood ranks
Rollingwood ranks lower within Texas (10th percentile statewide) than its 55th national percentile suggests alone — a calmer spot in a state where wildfire risk generally runs high. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Rollingwood ranks 14,349 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 15,095 by building count (1 is largest). Within Texas alone, it ranks 1,621 of 1,795 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Texas on its state page.
Shopping for coverage in Rollingwood
Rollingwood's elevated wildfire rating (55th percentile) isn't the kind of score driving the carrier pullback making news in the highest-risk Western markets — but a standard homeowners quote is still worth comparing on its own terms.
Lowering exposure, not just insuring around it
Even with 68.1% of Rollingwood outside USFS's Direct and Indirect zones, basic hardening — gutter maintenance, ember-resistant vents — is inexpensive relative to the regional burn-probability risk noted above. Details in the home-hardening guide.
Where Rollingwood's figures come from
The methodology guide shows exactly how USFS turned 658 counted buildings into the percentiles shown above for Rollingwood. The exposure-zones guide covers what Rollingwood's dominant minimal exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.