WildfireRiskFinder

Rehobeth, AL

Rehobeth, AL's wildfire risk, in USFS's own numbers

Elevated
58thpercentile nationally

Out of every US place USFS scores, Rehobeth lands at the 58th percentile for wildfire risk to structures — modestly above the national average for wildfire risk — a figure built from its 1,041 buildings, not the land around them. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)

Fire likelihood alone (USFS's burn-probability figure) ranks Rehobeth at the 59th national percentile — 1 points above its risk-to-structures score, a gap driven by how much is actually built there.

What "at risk" means for the buildings here

1,041Total buildings
87.9%Direct exposure
12%Indirect exposure
0.1%Minimal exposure

1,041 buildings are counted in Rehobeth, and 87.9% of them sit in USFS's Direct exposure zone — flame contact, not just ember cast, is the live possibility for most of them, against 0.1% rated Minimal.

Where Rehobeth ranks

Rehobeth ranks lower within Alabama (20th percentile statewide) than its 58th national percentile suggests alone — a calmer spot in a state where wildfire risk generally runs high. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Rehobeth ranks 13,288 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 11,646 by building count (1 is largest). Within Alabama alone, it ranks 474 of 592 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Alabama on its state page.

Rehobeth and the insurance market

At the 58th national percentile, Rehobeth rates elevated for wildfire risk — well short of the threshold where insurers have been withdrawing coverage, though comparing a quote costs nothing either way.

What would actually reduce this score

Rehobeth's 87.9% Direct-exposure share means lot clearing around the structure typically outweighs any single material upgrade here. The home-hardening guide ranks the options for a place shaped like this.

Where Rehobeth's figures come from

Rehobeth's 58th-percentile score and its burn-probability figure both come from the same USFS workbook, documented in the methodology guide. The exposure-zones guide covers what Rehobeth's dominant direct exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.