WildfireRiskFinder

North Logan, UT

North Logan, UT's wildfire risk, in USFS's own numbers

Very High
93rdpercentile nationally

North Logan sits at the 93rd percentile nationally for wildfire risk to structures — in USFS's highest wildfire-risk band nationally — per USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities model, built from its 3,375 counted buildings, not vegetation cover alone. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)

Separately from the risk score above, North Logan's burn probability — fire likelihood with no building count factored in — sits at the 90th percentile nationally.

What "at risk" means for the buildings here

3,375Total buildings
27.2%Direct exposure
36.5%Indirect exposure
36.3%Minimal exposure

Indirect exposure is dominant in North Logan (36.5% of 3,375 buildings): far enough from burnable vegetation to avoid flame contact, close enough for wind-blown embers. Only 27.2% sit in the Direct zone.

How North Logan compares

North Logan ranks lower within Utah (67th percentile statewide) than its 93rd national percentile suggests alone — a calmer spot in a state where wildfire risk generally runs high. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, North Logan ranks 2,283 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 4,949 by building count (1 is largest). Within Utah alone, it ranks 108 of 326 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Utah on its state page.

North Logan and the insurance market

At the 93rd percentile nationally, North Logan carries the very high rating that has pushed some carriers to limit new business in similarly-scored places elsewhere in the country. Worth comparing quotes rather than assuming last year's renewal terms still apply.

Hardening a home in North Logan

With ember exposure the dominant pattern in North Logan (36.5% Indirect), vent screens and roofing material tend to matter more than lot clearing alone. The home-hardening guide covers both.

More on how this number was built

North Logan's 93rd-percentile score and its burn-probability figure both come from the same USFS workbook, documented in the methodology guide. For more on what indirect exposure implies beyond North Logan, see the exposure-zones guide.