WildfireRiskFinder

Maumee, OH

Maumee, OH's wildfire risk, in USFS's own numbers

Low
8thpercentile nationally

Maumee's 7,854 buildings earn a 8th-percentile wildfire-risk score nationally under USFS's model — among the lower wildfire-risk places nationally. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)

USFS's separate burn-probability score — fire likelihood alone, before counting what's built there — puts Maumee at the 9th percentile, close to its 8th-percentile risk score.

Maumee's building exposure, zone by zone

7,854Total buildings
2.8%Direct exposure
0%Indirect exposure
97.2%Minimal exposure

Maumee rates 97.2% Minimal exposure against just 2.8% Direct and 0% Indirect — of 7,854 buildings counted, few sit close enough to burnable vegetation for USFS to flag them individually. At 7,854 buildings, this is a substantial built environment, so the shares below describe a real population of structures, not a handful of edge cases.

How Maumee compares

Compare Maumee's two percentiles: 28th within Ohio, only 8th nationally — a gap of 21 points that marks it as unusually exposed for its own state. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Maumee ranks 29,068 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 2,158 by building count (1 is largest). Within Ohio alone, it ranks 906 of 1,264 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Ohio on its state page.

Shopping for coverage in Maumee

Maumee's low wildfire rating (8th percentile) isn't the kind of score driving the carrier pullback making news in the highest-risk Western markets — but a standard homeowners quote is still worth comparing on its own terms.

Hardening a home in Maumee

Maumee's 97.2% Minimal-exposure share means structure-level hardening matters less here than it would elsewhere — still worth the low-cost basics, per the home-hardening guide.

Where Maumee's figures come from

The methodology guide shows exactly how USFS turned 7,854 counted buildings into the percentiles shown above for Maumee. The exposure-zones guide covers what Maumee's dominant minimal exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.