Marietta (Love), OK
Marietta (Love) wildfire risk explained
Marietta (Love) sits at the 90th percentile nationally for wildfire risk to structures — in USFS's highest wildfire-risk band nationally — per USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities model, built from its 1,522 counted buildings, not vegetation cover alone. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)
Fire likelihood alone (USFS's burn-probability figure) ranks Marietta (Love) at the 90th national percentile — 1 points above its risk-to-structures score, a gap driven by how much is actually built there.
Where Marietta (Love)'s buildings actually sit
1,522 buildings are counted in Marietta (Love), and 75.2% of them are Indirect exposure — ember-driven risk rather than the 24.8% in Direct exposure or the 0% rated Minimal.
How Marietta (Love) compares
Marietta (Love) ranks lower within Oklahoma (46th percentile statewide) than its 90th national percentile suggests alone — a calmer spot in a state where wildfire risk generally runs high. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Marietta (Love) ranks 3,316 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 9,075 by building count (1 is largest). Within Oklahoma alone, it ranks 454 of 834 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Oklahoma on its state page.
Shopping for coverage in Marietta (Love)
Marietta (Love)'s very high rating (90th percentile) puts it among the places where the national carrier-pullback trend is most relevant — not a guarantee of a coverage problem, but a reason to shop rather than assume.
Lowering exposure, not just insuring around it
With ember exposure the dominant pattern in Marietta (Love) (75.2% Indirect), vent screens and roofing material tend to matter more than lot clearing alone. The home-hardening guide covers both.
Where Marietta (Love)'s figures come from
Every one of the two percentiles behind Marietta (Love)'s 3,316-place national rank traces to USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities dataset — see the methodology guide. The exposure-zones guide covers what Marietta (Love)'s dominant indirect exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.