WildfireRiskFinder

Lindsay (Reeves), TX

Lindsay (Reeves), TX's wildfire risk, in USFS's own numbers

Elevated
55thpercentile nationally

USFS scores Lindsay (Reeves) at the 55th national percentile for wildfire risk to structures (modestly above the national average for wildfire risk), a figure built from 281 real buildings rather than raw vegetation cover. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)

Fire likelihood alone (USFS's burn-probability figure) ranks Lindsay (Reeves) at the 57th national percentile — 2 points above its risk-to-structures score, a gap driven by how much is actually built there.

Where Lindsay (Reeves)'s buildings actually sit

281Total buildings
58%Direct exposure
42%Indirect exposure
0%Minimal exposure

USFS classifies 58% of Lindsay (Reeves)'s buildings as Direct exposure, higher than its 42% Indirect share and far above its 0% Minimal share — a profile where 163 structures sit close enough to vegetation that lot clearing matters most.

How Lindsay (Reeves) compares

Lindsay (Reeves) ranks lower within Texas (10th percentile statewide) than its 55th national percentile suggests alone — a calmer spot in a state where wildfire risk generally runs high. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Lindsay (Reeves) ranks 14,260 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 22,167 by building count (1 is largest). Within Texas alone, it ranks 1,618 of 1,795 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Texas on its state page.

What this risk score means for insurance

Lindsay (Reeves)'s elevated wildfire rating (55th percentile) isn't the kind of score driving the carrier pullback making news in the highest-risk Western markets — but a standard homeowners quote is still worth comparing on its own terms.

Hardening a home in Lindsay (Reeves)

Because Direct exposure dominates in Lindsay (Reeves) (58%), the highest-leverage fix is defensible space, not roofing or vents alone — covered in the home-hardening guide.

Where Lindsay (Reeves)'s figures come from

Lindsay (Reeves)'s 55th-percentile score and its burn-probability figure both come from the same USFS workbook, documented in the methodology guide. The exposure-zones guide covers what Lindsay (Reeves)'s dominant direct exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.