Landfall, MN
Landfall wildfire risk explained
Landfall sits at the 32nd percentile nationally for wildfire risk to structures — close to the middle of USFS's national wildfire-risk range — per USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities model, built from its 310 counted buildings, not vegetation cover alone. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)
Separately from the risk score above, Landfall's burn probability — fire likelihood with no building count factored in — sits at the 32nd percentile nationally.
Landfall's building exposure, zone by zone
USFS classifies 100% of Landfall's buildings as Minimal exposure, the largest of the three zones here by a wide margin over 0% Direct and 0% Indirect — a landscape-level risk rather than a building-by-building one.
How Landfall compares
There's little gap between Landfall's 32nd national percentile and its 38th percentile inside Minnesota, which means the state comparison mostly confirms what the national score already shows. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Landfall ranks 21,587 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 21,371 by building count (1 is largest). Within Minnesota alone, it ranks 569 of 914 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Minnesota on its state page.
Shopping for coverage in Landfall
At the 32nd national percentile, Landfall rates moderate for wildfire risk — well short of the threshold where insurers have been withdrawing coverage, though comparing a quote costs nothing either way.
Lowering exposure, not just insuring around it
With 100% of buildings rated Minimal exposure, Landfall gets less benefit from structure hardening than a Direct- or Indirect-dominant place would — the home-hardening guide explains why the zone matters.
More on how this number was built
The methodology guide shows exactly how USFS turned 310 counted buildings into the percentiles shown above for Landfall. For more on what minimal exposure implies beyond Landfall, see the exposure-zones guide.