WildfireRiskFinder

Katie, OK

Katie wildfire risk explained

Very High
94thpercentile nationally

Out of every US place USFS scores, Katie lands at the 94th percentile for wildfire risk to structures — in USFS's highest wildfire-risk band nationally — a figure built from its 452 buildings, not the land around them. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)

USFS's separate burn-probability score — fire likelihood alone, before counting what's built there — puts Katie at the 95th percentile, close to its 94th-percentile risk score.

Where Katie's buildings actually sit

452Total buildings
99.8%Direct exposure
0.2%Indirect exposure
0%Minimal exposure

Of Katie's 452 counted buildings, 99.8% carry Direct exposure and only 0% carry Minimal — a lopsided split that puts defensible-space clearing ahead of vents or roofing as the intervention worth doing first.

Where Katie ranks

Inside Oklahoma, Katie sits at just the 71st percentile even though it scores 94th nationally — the state's overall wildfire exposure is high enough to make this a relatively quiet corner of it. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Katie ranks 1,960 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 18,239 by building count (1 is largest). Within Oklahoma alone, it ranks 243 of 834 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Oklahoma on its state page.

What this risk score means for insurance

Katie's very high rating (94th percentile) puts it among the places where the national carrier-pullback trend is most relevant — not a guarantee of a coverage problem, but a reason to shop rather than assume.

What would actually reduce this score

With 99.8% of Katie in Direct exposure, defensible-space clearing and ember-resistant construction (vents, Class-A roofing) address the exposure this page's own numbers describe, not a generic checklist. See the home-hardening guide.

More on how this number was built

Every one of the two percentiles behind Katie's 1,960-place national rank traces to USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities dataset — see the methodology guide. For more on what direct exposure implies beyond Katie, see the exposure-zones guide.