WildfireRiskFinder

Green Park, MO

Green Park wildfire risk explained

Elevated
43rdpercentile nationally

USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities model puts Green Park at the 43rd national percentile for risk to structures, modestly above the national average for wildfire risk — a score built from 1,280 actual buildings. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)

Separately from the risk score above, Green Park's burn probability — fire likelihood with no building count factored in — sits at the 47th percentile nationally.

Where Green Park's buildings actually sit

1,280Total buildings
0.7%Direct exposure
0%Indirect exposure
99.3%Minimal exposure

Green Park rates 99.3% Minimal exposure against just 0.7% Direct and 0% Indirect — of 1,280 buildings counted, few sit close enough to burnable vegetation for USFS to flag them individually.

Green Park against the rest of the country

Inside Missouri, Green Park sits at just the 19th percentile even though it scores 43rd nationally — the state's overall wildfire exposure is high enough to make this a relatively quiet corner of it. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Green Park ranks 17,902 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 10,197 by building count (1 is largest). Within Missouri alone, it ranks 858 of 1,062 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Missouri on its state page.

Shopping for coverage in Green Park

At the 43rd national percentile, Green Park rates elevated for wildfire risk — well short of the threshold where insurers have been withdrawing coverage, though comparing a quote costs nothing either way.

Hardening a home in Green Park

Green Park's 99.3% Minimal-exposure share means structure-level hardening matters less here than it would elsewhere — still worth the low-cost basics, per the home-hardening guide.

Where Green Park's figures come from

Green Park's 43rd-percentile score and its burn-probability figure both come from the same USFS workbook, documented in the methodology guide. The exposure-zones guide covers what Green Park's dominant minimal exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.