Green, OR
Green, OR's wildfire risk, in USFS's own numbers
USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities model puts Green at the 70th national percentile for risk to structures, well above the national norm for wildfire risk — a score built from 3,718 actual buildings. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)
USFS's separate burn-probability score — fire likelihood alone, before counting what's built there — puts Green at the 69th percentile, close to its 70th-percentile risk score.
What "at risk" means for the buildings here
Most of Green's buildings (88.4%) sit in the Indirect zone, where wind-blown embers rather than flame front are the mechanism USFS is scoring — ember-resistant vents and non-combustible roofing are the interventions this pattern favors, more than defensible space alone.
How Green compares
Green's risk sits at a similar level relative to Oregon (55th percentile statewide) as it does nationally (70th) — this place isn't unusual for its own state either way. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Green ranks 9,495 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 4,503 by building count (1 is largest). Within Oregon alone, it ranks 190 of 420 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Oregon on its state page.
What this risk score means for insurance
Green's 70th-percentile score lands in Oregon, the only two states requiring a wildfire disclosure at sale. Oregon's own hazard map feeds directly into that disclosure requirement. The disclosure-law guide covers what it requires.
Lowering exposure, not just insuring around it
Green's 88.4% Indirect-exposure share points at embers, not flame contact, as the main pathway — ember-resistant vents and non-combustible roofing rank ahead of defensible space here. Detail in the home-hardening guide.
More on how this number was built
The methodology guide shows exactly how USFS turned 3,718 counted buildings into the percentiles shown above for Green. For more on what indirect exposure implies beyond Green, see the exposure-zones guide.