Grant, OK
Grant, OK's wildfire risk, in USFS's own numbers
USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities model puts Grant at the 78th national percentile for risk to structures, well above the national norm for wildfire risk — a score built from 235 actual buildings. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)
Separately from the risk score above, Grant's burn probability — fire likelihood with no building count factored in — sits at the 80th percentile nationally.
Where Grant's buildings actually sit
235 buildings are counted in Grant, and 66.8% of them sit in USFS's Direct exposure zone — flame contact, not just ember cast, is the live possibility for most of them, against 0% rated Minimal.
How Grant compares
Inside Oklahoma, Grant sits at just the 16th percentile even though it scores 78th nationally — the state's overall wildfire exposure is high enough to make this a relatively quiet corner of it. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Grant ranks 7,065 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 23,643 by building count (1 is largest). Within Oklahoma alone, it ranks 697 of 834 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Oklahoma on its state page.
Grant and the insurance market
At the 78th percentile nationally, Grant carries the high rating that has pushed some carriers to limit new business in similarly-scored places elsewhere in the country. Worth comparing quotes rather than assuming last year's renewal terms still apply.
Lowering exposure, not just insuring around it
Grant's 66.8% Direct-exposure share means lot clearing around the structure typically outweighs any single material upgrade here. The home-hardening guide ranks the options for a place shaped like this.
More on how this number was built
Grant's 78th-percentile score and its burn-probability figure both come from the same USFS workbook, documented in the methodology guide. For more on what direct exposure implies beyond Grant, see the exposure-zones guide.