WildfireRiskFinder

Graceville, MN

Graceville, MN's wildfire risk, in USFS's own numbers

Moderate
23rdpercentile nationally

USFS scores Graceville at the 23rd national percentile for wildfire risk to structures (close to the middle of USFS's national wildfire-risk range), a figure built from 484 real buildings rather than raw vegetation cover. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)

Separately from the risk score above, Graceville's burn probability — fire likelihood with no building count factored in — sits at the 16th percentile nationally.

Where Graceville's buildings actually sit

484Total buildings
15.9%Direct exposure
0%Indirect exposure
84.1%Minimal exposure

Graceville rates 84.1% Minimal exposure against just 15.9% Direct and 0% Indirect — of 484 buildings counted, few sit close enough to burnable vegetation for USFS to flag them individually.

Where Graceville ranks

Graceville's risk sits at a similar level relative to Minnesota (27th percentile statewide) as it does nationally (23rd) — this place isn't unusual for its own state either way. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Graceville ranks 24,143 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 17,633 by building count (1 is largest). Within Minnesota alone, it ranks 665 of 914 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Minnesota on its state page.

Shopping for coverage in Graceville

Graceville's moderate rating (23rd percentile nationally) sits outside the range where wildfire risk alone reshapes an insurance market — still, a homeowner here loses nothing by comparing rates.

Hardening a home in Graceville

Graceville's 84.1% Minimal-exposure share means structure-level hardening matters less here than it would elsewhere — still worth the low-cost basics, per the home-hardening guide.

Where Graceville's figures come from

Graceville's 23rd-percentile score and its burn-probability figure both come from the same USFS workbook, documented in the methodology guide. The exposure-zones guide covers what Graceville's dominant minimal exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.