WildfireRiskFinder

East Camden, AR

East Camden, AR's wildfire risk, in USFS's own numbers

Elevated
57thpercentile nationally

East Camden's 382 buildings earn a 57th-percentile wildfire-risk score nationally under USFS's model — modestly above the national average for wildfire risk. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)

Fire likelihood alone (USFS's burn-probability figure) ranks East Camden at the 58th national percentile — 1 points above its risk-to-structures score, a gap driven by how much is actually built there.

What "at risk" means for the buildings here

382Total buildings
17.8%Direct exposure
82.2%Indirect exposure
0%Minimal exposure

Most of East Camden's buildings (82.2%) sit in the Indirect zone, where wind-blown embers rather than flame front are the mechanism USFS is scoring — ember-resistant vents and non-combustible roofing are the interventions this pattern favors, more than defensible space alone.

East Camden against the rest of the country

East Camden ranks lower within Arkansas (36th percentile statewide) than its 57th national percentile suggests alone — a calmer spot in a state where wildfire risk generally runs high. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, East Camden ranks 13,637 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 19,587 by building count (1 is largest). Within Arkansas alone, it ranks 393 of 614 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Arkansas on its state page.

What this risk score means for insurance

At the 57th national percentile, East Camden rates elevated for wildfire risk — well short of the threshold where insurers have been withdrawing coverage, though comparing a quote costs nothing either way.

Hardening a home in East Camden

East Camden's 82.2% Indirect-exposure share points at embers, not flame contact, as the main pathway — ember-resistant vents and non-combustible roofing rank ahead of defensible space here. Detail in the home-hardening guide.

Where East Camden's figures come from

East Camden's 57th-percentile score and its burn-probability figure both come from the same USFS workbook, documented in the methodology guide. The exposure-zones guide covers what East Camden's dominant indirect exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.