Davenport, OK
How exposed is Davenport to wildfire?
USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities model puts Davenport at the 94th national percentile for risk to structures, in USFS's highest wildfire-risk band nationally — a score built from 567 actual buildings. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)
Fire likelihood alone (USFS's burn-probability figure) ranks Davenport at the 95th national percentile — 1 points above its risk-to-structures score, a gap driven by how much is actually built there.
Davenport's building exposure, zone by zone
567 buildings are counted in Davenport, and 49.9% of them sit in USFS's Direct exposure zone — flame contact, not just ember cast, is the live possibility for most of them, against 33.9% rated Minimal.
Davenport against the rest of the country
Inside Oklahoma, Davenport sits at just the 71st percentile even though it scores 94th nationally — the state's overall wildfire exposure is high enough to make this a relatively quiet corner of it. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Davenport ranks 1,959 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 16,299 by building count (1 is largest). Within Oklahoma alone, it ranks 242 of 834 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Oklahoma on its state page.
What this risk score means for insurance
Davenport's 94th-percentile, very high rating is the kind of score behind a broader national pattern: insurers pulling back from the highest wildfire-risk markets, non-renewing or declining new policies outright, most visibly in California. Shopping around, not assuming automatic renewal, tends to matter here.
What would actually reduce this score
With 49.9% of Davenport in Direct exposure, defensible-space clearing and ember-resistant construction (vents, Class-A roofing) address the exposure this page's own numbers describe, not a generic checklist. See the home-hardening guide.
More on how this number was built
Davenport's 94th-percentile score and its burn-probability figure both come from the same USFS workbook, documented in the methodology guide. For more on what direct exposure implies beyond Davenport, see the exposure-zones guide.