Davenport, FL
Davenport, FL's wildfire risk, in USFS's own numbers
Davenport's 2,218 buildings earn a 89th-percentile wildfire-risk score nationally under USFS's model — in USFS's highest wildfire-risk band nationally. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)
USFS's separate burn-probability score — fire likelihood alone, before counting what's built there — puts Davenport at the 91st percentile, close to its 89th-percentile risk score.
Davenport's building exposure, zone by zone
Most of Davenport's buildings (62%) sit in the Indirect zone, where wind-blown embers rather than flame front are the mechanism USFS is scoring — ember-resistant vents and non-combustible roofing are the interventions this pattern favors, more than defensible space alone.
Davenport against the rest of the country
There's little gap between Davenport's 89th national percentile and its 78th percentile inside Florida, which means the state comparison mostly confirms what the national score already shows. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Davenport ranks 3,495 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 6,884 by building count (1 is largest). Within Florida alone, it ranks 210 of 955 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Florida on its state page.
Davenport and the insurance market
At the 89th percentile nationally, Davenport carries the very high rating that has pushed some carriers to limit new business in similarly-scored places elsewhere in the country. Worth comparing quotes rather than assuming last year's renewal terms still apply.
Lowering exposure, not just insuring around it
With ember exposure the dominant pattern in Davenport (62% Indirect), vent screens and roofing material tend to matter more than lot clearing alone. The home-hardening guide covers both.
Where Davenport's figures come from
Davenport's 89th-percentile score and its burn-probability figure both come from the same USFS workbook, documented in the methodology guide. The exposure-zones guide covers what Davenport's dominant indirect exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.