Crump, TN
How exposed is Crump to wildfire?
USFS scores Crump at the 61st national percentile for wildfire risk to structures (well above the national norm for wildfire risk), a figure built from 754 real buildings rather than raw vegetation cover. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)
Fire likelihood alone (USFS's burn-probability figure) ranks Crump at the 64th national percentile — 3 points above its risk-to-structures score, a gap driven by how much is actually built there.
Crump's building exposure, zone by zone
USFS classifies 79.3% of Crump's buildings as Direct exposure, higher than its 19.9% Indirect share and far above its 0.8% Minimal share — a profile where 598 structures sit close enough to vegetation that lot clearing matters most.
Crump against the rest of the country
There's little gap between Crump's 61st national percentile and its 53rd percentile inside Tennessee, which means the state comparison mostly confirms what the national score already shows. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Crump ranks 12,428 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 14,086 by building count (1 is largest). Within Tennessee alone, it ranks 236 of 502 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Tennessee on its state page.
Shopping for coverage in Crump
Crump's high rating (61st percentile) puts it among the places where the national carrier-pullback trend is most relevant — not a guarantee of a coverage problem, but a reason to shop rather than assume.
Hardening a home in Crump
Crump's 79.3% Direct-exposure share means lot clearing around the structure typically outweighs any single material upgrade here. The home-hardening guide ranks the options for a place shaped like this.
More on how this number was built
Every one of the two percentiles behind Crump's 12,428-place national rank traces to USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities dataset — see the methodology guide. For more on what direct exposure implies beyond Crump, see the exposure-zones guide.