Campbellsport, WI
Campbellsport, WI's wildfire risk, in USFS's own numbers
Out of every US place USFS scores, Campbellsport lands at the 29th percentile for wildfire risk to structures — close to the middle of USFS's national wildfire-risk range — a figure built from its 859 buildings, not the land around them. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)
Fire likelihood alone (USFS's burn-probability figure) ranks Campbellsport at the 30th national percentile — 1 points above its risk-to-structures score, a gap driven by how much is actually built there.
Where Campbellsport's buildings actually sit
USFS classifies 90.7% of Campbellsport's buildings as Minimal exposure, the largest of the three zones here by a wide margin over 9.3% Direct and 0% Indirect — a landscape-level risk rather than a building-by-building one.
Campbellsport against the rest of the country
Within Wisconsin, Campbellsport ranks higher (61st percentile) than it does nationally (29th) — one of the more fire-exposed places in a state that, overall, scores lower than that. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Campbellsport ranks 22,489 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 13,097 by building count (1 is largest). Within Wisconsin alone, it ranks 317 of 808 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Wisconsin on its state page.
Campbellsport and the insurance market
Campbellsport's moderate wildfire rating (29th percentile) isn't the kind of score driving the carrier pullback making news in the highest-risk Western markets — but a standard homeowners quote is still worth comparing on its own terms.
What would actually reduce this score
Campbellsport's 90.7% Minimal-exposure share means structure-level hardening matters less here than it would elsewhere — still worth the low-cost basics, per the home-hardening guide.
Where Campbellsport's figures come from
The methodology guide shows exactly how USFS turned 859 counted buildings into the percentiles shown above for Campbellsport. The exposure-zones guide covers what Campbellsport's dominant minimal exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.