WildfireRiskFinder

Brandon, IA

Brandon wildfire risk explained

Moderate
26thpercentile nationally

USFS scores Brandon at the 26th national percentile for wildfire risk to structures (close to the middle of USFS's national wildfire-risk range), a figure built from 240 real buildings rather than raw vegetation cover. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)

Fire likelihood alone (USFS's burn-probability figure) ranks Brandon at the 26th national percentile — 0 points above its risk-to-structures score, a gap driven by how much is actually built there.

What "at risk" means for the buildings here

240Total buildings
17.1%Direct exposure
0%Indirect exposure
82.9%Minimal exposure

Most of Brandon's buildings (82.9% of 240) fall outside USFS's Direct and Indirect zones entirely — that doesn't zero out the score above, it means the risk is regional, not structure-by-structure.

Where Brandon ranks

Brandon's risk sits at a similar level relative to Iowa (39th percentile statewide) as it does nationally (26th) — this place isn't unusual for its own state either way. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Brandon ranks 23,475 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 23,458 by building count (1 is largest). Within Iowa alone, it ranks 616 of 1,017 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Iowa on its state page.

What this risk score means for insurance

Brandon's moderate rating (26th percentile nationally) sits outside the range where wildfire risk alone reshapes an insurance market — still, a homeowner here loses nothing by comparing rates.

What would actually reduce this score

Brandon's 82.9% Minimal-exposure share means structure-level hardening matters less here than it would elsewhere — still worth the low-cost basics, per the home-hardening guide.

Where Brandon's figures come from

Brandon's 26th-percentile score and its burn-probability figure both come from the same USFS workbook, documented in the methodology guide. The exposure-zones guide covers what Brandon's dominant minimal exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.