WildfireRiskFinder

Beasley, TX

How exposed is Beasley to wildfire?

High
67thpercentile nationally

Beasley's 360 buildings earn a 67th-percentile wildfire-risk score nationally under USFS's model — well above the national norm for wildfire risk. (Source: USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities methodology.)

USFS's separate burn-probability score — fire likelihood alone, before counting what's built there — puts Beasley at the 70th percentile, close to its 67th-percentile risk score.

Where Beasley's buildings actually sit

360Total buildings
21.4%Direct exposure
78.6%Indirect exposure
0%Minimal exposure

78.6% of Beasley's 360 buildings fall in USFS's Indirect exposure zone — ember cast rather than direct flame — against 21.4% Direct and 0% Minimal. Vent screens and roofing material matter more here than lot clearing alone.

Where Beasley ranks

Beasley ranks lower within Texas (25th percentile statewide) than its 67th national percentile suggests alone — a calmer spot in a state where wildfire risk generally runs high. Among the 31,521 US communities USFS scores, Beasley ranks 10,316 for wildfire risk (1 is highest) and 20,071 by building count (1 is largest). Within Texas alone, it ranks 1,344 of 1,795 places by risk. See the full county-by-county picture for Texas on its state page.

Shopping for coverage in Beasley

At the 67th percentile nationally, Beasley carries the high rating that has pushed some carriers to limit new business in similarly-scored places elsewhere in the country. Worth comparing quotes rather than assuming last year's renewal terms still apply.

Hardening a home in Beasley

With ember exposure the dominant pattern in Beasley (78.6% Indirect), vent screens and roofing material tend to matter more than lot clearing alone. The home-hardening guide covers both.

Where Beasley's figures come from

Every one of the two percentiles behind Beasley's 10,316-place national rank traces to USFS's Wildfire Risk to Communities dataset — see the methodology guide. The exposure-zones guide covers what Beasley's dominant indirect exposure actually means, with real examples from across the dataset.